<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MarkMcB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markmcb.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markmcb.com</link>
	<description>Mark McBride of San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:52:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integer Compression in Ruby (Base-10 to Base-62) by Mike</title>
		<link>http://markmcb.com/2011/11/02/integer-compression-in-ruby-base-10-to-base-62/#comment-3112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markmcb.com/?p=415#comment-3112</guid>
		<description>I was looking for a way to compress integers and came across your blog. I later found a solution I like better.

This changes the base from 10 to 32 and back. I&#039;m not sure if there are any benefits to base 64, like you are using.

Here is the solution I went with.

# compress
1234567890.to_s(36)
 =&gt; &quot;kf12oi&quot; 

&quot; decompress
&quot;kf12oi&quot;.to_i(36)
 =&gt; 1234567890</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking for a way to compress integers and came across your blog. I later found a solution I like better.</p>
<p>This changes the base from 10 to 32 and back. I&#8217;m not sure if there are any benefits to base 64, like you are using.</p>
<p>Here is the solution I went with.</p>
<p># compress<br />
1234567890.to_s(36)<br />
 =&gt; &#8220;kf12oi&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8221; decompress<br />
&#8220;kf12oi&#8221;.to_i(36)<br />
 =&gt; 1234567890</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Replacing â€“, â€™, â€œ, etc., with UTF-8 Characters in Ruby on Rails by steven shustak</title>
		<link>http://markmcb.com/2011/11/07/replacing-ae%e2%80%9c-ae%e2%84%a2-aeoe-etc-with-utf-8-characters-in-ruby-on-rails/#comment-3090</link>
		<dc:creator>steven shustak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markmcb.com/?p=449#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>I have been getting unusual characters within some email messages which appear randomly, across the board, so to speak. As I recall, they show up in place of the letter &quot; s &quot; in most instances. I&#039;ve noticed them for 6 or more months now in &quot;text&quot; and/or in &quot;rich text&quot; documents. According to your information they have been found in: &quot;  â€œ &quot;  or variations of same characters.
In my humble, unsophisticated opinion, they are freak code of some form or other. Kindly advise me if new info comes out. I am most curious. Thanks,
Steve Shustak, e/m address: sshustak@comcast.net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been getting unusual characters within some email messages which appear randomly, across the board, so to speak. As I recall, they show up in place of the letter &#8221; s &#8221; in most instances. I&#8217;ve noticed them for 6 or more months now in &#8220;text&#8221; and/or in &#8220;rich text&#8221; documents. According to your information they have been found in: &#8221;  â€œ &#8221;  or variations of same characters.<br />
In my humble, unsophisticated opinion, they are freak code of some form or other. Kindly advise me if new info comes out. I am most curious. Thanks,<br />
Steve Shustak, e/m address: <a href="mailto:sshustak@comcast.net">sshustak@comcast.net</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Reasons Aperture and Picasa are a Great Photo Combo by Peter</title>
		<link>http://markmcb.com/2011/10/28/3-reasons-aperture-and-picasa-are-a-great-photo-combo/#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markmcb.com/?p=418#comment-3084</guid>
		<description>nevermind, found it :) thanks for you swift reply</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nevermind, found it :) thanks for you swift reply</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Reasons Aperture and Picasa are a Great Photo Combo by Peter</title>
		<link>http://markmcb.com/2011/10/28/3-reasons-aperture-and-picasa-are-a-great-photo-combo/#comment-3083</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markmcb.com/?p=418#comment-3083</guid>
		<description>You are saying that you move the stuff to a folder that picasa is watching? I have no idea how to set up such a local folder that is watched by picasa. I am using a Mac, and i have the picasa album updater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are saying that you move the stuff to a folder that picasa is watching? I have no idea how to set up such a local folder that is watched by picasa. I am using a Mac, and i have the picasa album updater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Reasons Aperture and Picasa are a Great Photo Combo by markmcb</title>
		<link>http://markmcb.com/2011/10/28/3-reasons-aperture-and-picasa-are-a-great-photo-combo/#comment-3082</link>
		<dc:creator>markmcb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markmcb.com/?p=418#comment-3082</guid>
		<description>I tried that plugin too and wasn&#039;t too happy with it.  I just export from Aperture locally (as mentioned above).  I command-shift-E and send my pictures marked as &quot;public&quot; (i.e., green) to a folder that Picasa is watching.  I let Picasa handle the syncing with picasaweb and Google+</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried that plugin too and wasn&#8217;t too happy with it.  I just export from Aperture locally (as mentioned above).  I command-shift-E and send my pictures marked as &#8220;public&#8221; (i.e., green) to a folder that Picasa is watching.  I let Picasa handle the syncing with picasaweb and Google+</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Reasons Aperture and Picasa are a Great Photo Combo by Peter</title>
		<link>http://markmcb.com/2011/10/28/3-reasons-aperture-and-picasa-are-a-great-photo-combo/#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markmcb.com/?p=418#comment-3081</guid>
		<description>I am a new user of Aperture, and is trying to get my workflow in order. When googling i am able to find a picasaweb export plugin, but now it seems that ubermind has discontinued that plugin, do you have any other alternatives to do the exporting, i like the idea of using a color-label to mark all pictures to be a exported, but i would like more of a sync-tool than just exporting pictures in an album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a new user of Aperture, and is trying to get my workflow in order. When googling i am able to find a picasaweb export plugin, but now it seems that ubermind has discontinued that plugin, do you have any other alternatives to do the exporting, i like the idea of using a color-label to mark all pictures to be a exported, but i would like more of a sync-tool than just exporting pictures in an album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Reasons Aperture and Picasa are a Great Photo Combo by Kane</title>
		<link>http://markmcb.com/2011/10/28/3-reasons-aperture-and-picasa-are-a-great-photo-combo/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markmcb.com/?p=418#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the GREAT tips. I feel the same as you and decided to use all the great features that Google has provided.  I&#039;m currently using Aperture and was looking for a method of moving photos (completed) to Picasa and your workflow makes good sense.  I&#039;ve been an Apple fanboy for years but have decided to look at other options,  I&#039;m also into Linux and have recently purchased a XOOM tablet (not an iPad at this time) Android and Google fit like a glove!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the GREAT tips. I feel the same as you and decided to use all the great features that Google has provided.  I&#8217;m currently using Aperture and was looking for a method of moving photos (completed) to Picasa and your workflow makes good sense.  I&#8217;ve been an Apple fanboy for years but have decided to look at other options,  I&#8217;m also into Linux and have recently purchased a XOOM tablet (not an iPad at this time) Android and Google fit like a glove!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Reasons Aperture and Picasa are a Great Photo Combo by Neil Youngson</title>
		<link>http://markmcb.com/2011/10/28/3-reasons-aperture-and-picasa-are-a-great-photo-combo/#comment-3065</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Youngson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markmcb.com/?p=418#comment-3065</guid>
		<description>Nice article, but I think maybe the title should have read &quot;3 Reasons Aperture and Picasa are a Great Photo Combo, and 1 deal-breaker!&quot;

The deal breaker is the lack of support in Picasa web albums for nested albums. I had hoped Picasa would be a suitable replacement for iWeb/MobileMe, but without even a single layer of nesting I&#039;m going to have to find an alternative, which is a shame because otherwise I like Picasa web albums and the desktop Mac app is not bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, but I think maybe the title should have read &#8220;3 Reasons Aperture and Picasa are a Great Photo Combo, and 1 deal-breaker!&#8221;</p>
<p>The deal breaker is the lack of support in Picasa web albums for nested albums. I had hoped Picasa would be a suitable replacement for iWeb/MobileMe, but without even a single layer of nesting I&#8217;m going to have to find an alternative, which is a shame because otherwise I like Picasa web albums and the desktop Mac app is not bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Reasons Aperture and Picasa are a Great Photo Combo by markmcb</title>
		<link>http://markmcb.com/2011/10/28/3-reasons-aperture-and-picasa-are-a-great-photo-combo/#comment-2406</link>
		<dc:creator>markmcb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markmcb.com/?p=418#comment-2406</guid>
		<description>Ultimately it comes down to how fast your connection is to your data.  Given that it&#039;s all local, I&#039;m assuming it&#039;s very fast.  I&#039;d just do a rough speed test.  Maybe see how long it takes your computer to move 1 GB locally and then do the same to/from your NAS.  Unless you notice a really big difference between the two, you should have no problems. (And if you do notice a big lag, you&#039;ve probably got a network or config issue somewhere.)

I don&#039;t notice any performance issues when using my local network.  Also, I don&#039;t really access the older images that I put in the other libraries much either.  I think that&#039;s a big thing to consider.  If you only occasionally need them, any performance issues you have might not be a big deal.

The big tradeoff isn&#039;t speed so much as it is when you&#039;re away and suddenly realize you want that image that&#039;s only on your server.  I&#039;ve never really ran into this scenario as I can always wait until I&#039;m home and can plug back in, but it&#039;s the main thing I&#039;d consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately it comes down to how fast your connection is to your data.  Given that it&#8217;s all local, I&#8217;m assuming it&#8217;s very fast.  I&#8217;d just do a rough speed test.  Maybe see how long it takes your computer to move 1 GB locally and then do the same to/from your NAS.  Unless you notice a really big difference between the two, you should have no problems. (And if you do notice a big lag, you&#8217;ve probably got a network or config issue somewhere.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t notice any performance issues when using my local network.  Also, I don&#8217;t really access the older images that I put in the other libraries much either.  I think that&#8217;s a big thing to consider.  If you only occasionally need them, any performance issues you have might not be a big deal.</p>
<p>The big tradeoff isn&#8217;t speed so much as it is when you&#8217;re away and suddenly realize you want that image that&#8217;s only on your server.  I&#8217;ve never really ran into this scenario as I can always wait until I&#8217;m home and can plug back in, but it&#8217;s the main thing I&#8217;d consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Reasons Aperture and Picasa are a Great Photo Combo by Danny</title>
		<link>http://markmcb.com/2011/10/28/3-reasons-aperture-and-picasa-are-a-great-photo-combo/#comment-2314</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markmcb.com/?p=418#comment-2314</guid>
		<description>thanks for the quick reply

I use iphoto today and my library is close to 140gb on my MB with a 250gb drive.   I very seriously considering moving to Aperture/Picasa combo.

Read about your NAS setup and its quite neat.  I am currently using an HTPC/NAS solution with W7K and it wirelessly connects to my home network.

I need to move to Aperture on my MB but a little unsure about storing libraries on the NAS (HFS+ partition on the W7K machine), from speed and reliability/compatibility perspective.

What are you thoughts on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the quick reply</p>
<p>I use iphoto today and my library is close to 140gb on my MB with a 250gb drive.   I very seriously considering moving to Aperture/Picasa combo.</p>
<p>Read about your NAS setup and its quite neat.  I am currently using an HTPC/NAS solution with W7K and it wirelessly connects to my home network.</p>
<p>I need to move to Aperture on my MB but a little unsure about storing libraries on the NAS (HFS+ partition on the W7K machine), from speed and reliability/compatibility perspective.</p>
<p>What are you thoughts on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  markmcb.com/comments/feed/ ) in 0.08624 seconds, on May 18th, 2012 at 11:13 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 18th, 2012 at 12:13 pm UTC -->
